<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video vs still photography, pt 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://artisticwhim.com/blog/2006/08/video-vs-still-photography-pt-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://artisticwhim.com/blog/2006/08/video-vs-still-photography-pt-1/</link>
	<description>Going after inspiration with a stick</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 04:04:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Impulse</title>
		<link>http://artisticwhim.com/blog/2006/08/video-vs-still-photography-pt-1/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Impulse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artisticwhim.com/blog/?p=159#comment-89</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Video vs still photography, pt 2&lt;/strong&gt;

Last time, I described a few technical differences that make video more difficult than stills. Video has a curious advantage over still photography, though: Because there&#039;s less you can control in video and because the medium is inherently lower qualit...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Video vs still photography, pt 2</strong></p>
<p>Last time, I described a few technical differences that make video more difficult than stills. Video has a curious advantage over still photography, though: Because there’s less you can control in video and because the medium is inherently lower qualit…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
