<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I am a writing machine!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://artisticwhim.com/blog/2008/01/i-am-a-writing-machine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://artisticwhim.com/blog/2008/01/i-am-a-writing-machine/</link>
	<description>Going after inspiration with a stick</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 04:04:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://artisticwhim.com/blog/2008/01/i-am-a-writing-machine/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 20:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artisticwhim.com/blog/?p=206#comment-113</guid>
		<description>In this case, it was technical: I was brain dumping documentation describing the work I did at my last startup (www.lilipip.com).  The fact that it was a brain dump was the advantage here.  I wrote the outline and then just needed to fill in the blanks. I&#039;ve found that with technical writing, if I&#039;m not able to write fast, it&#039;s because either 1) I don&#039;t know the material well enough yet, so go back and learn, or 2) I don&#039;t have a solid outline.
Creatively, I&#039;ve written at about 500 words/h when it&#039;s really good and it feels like I&#039;m just taking dictation for the story that&#039;s whispering itself in my ear.  I&#039;ve also spent three hours on one sentence (I&#039;ve yet to learn when to give up).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this case, it was technical: I was brain dumping documentation describing the work I did at my last startup (www.lilipip.com).  The fact that it was a brain dump was the advantage here.  I wrote the outline and then just needed to fill in the blanks. I’ve found that with technical writing, if I’m not able to write fast, it’s because either 1) I don’t know the material well enough yet, so go back and learn, or 2) I don’t have a solid outline.<br />
Creatively, I’ve written at about 500 words/h when it’s really good and it feels like I’m just taking dictation for the story that’s whispering itself in my ear.  I’ve also spent three hours on one sentence (I’ve yet to learn when to give up).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schappell</title>
		<link>http://artisticwhim.com/blog/2008/01/i-am-a-writing-machine/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schappell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 20:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artisticwhim.com/blog/?p=206#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Was that technical documentation, or creative?  You say that it&#039;s procedural, but it makes me wonder what the gig entailed (broadly).  In any case, that&#039;s a lot of hourly writing!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was that technical documentation, or creative?  You say that it’s procedural, but it makes me wonder what the gig entailed (broadly).  In any case, that’s a lot of hourly writing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

